Wednesday 12 January 2011

Who is Muawiya ibn Abu Sufyan?

The story of Ashura and the great sacrifice made by Imam Hussain (a.s.) to save the religion of Islam was a classic tale of good versus evil. Imam Hussain (a.s) lost the battle but definitely won the war. The evil in these events was personified by Yazid ibn Muawiya (may Allah curse him), a man who was simply a despicable human, let alone a so-called Muslim.

His reign as "caliph" was short but painful. In his first year of rule he commanded his forces to kill the grandson of the Holy Prophet, along with his family and friends and in the second year he attacked the Holy Kaa'ba and set fire to it. He was a power-hungry, selfish and arrogant man but tracing through history, he was not the real brains behind the attempt to destroy Islam, the real brains was his father - Muawiya ibn Abu Sufyan. Of the trio of the founding Umayyad fathers, Abu Sufyan, Muawiya and Yazid, Muawiya is the most significant, the most influential and most cunning.

Sunnis lay a lot of credit on Muawiya's door. They have a lot invested in him. They don't really take note of Abu Sufyan and condemn the actions of Yazid, on the whole (apart from fools like Dr. Zakir Naik). Muawiya on the other hand is treated with a lot of respect. They call him Hazrat Muawiya - rasiallahu-anhu (may Allah be pleased with him) amongst other respectful titles. He has been bizarrely sanctified by the Ahle Sunnah over the centuries, his reputation has been shrouded in myths, legends and propaganda.

The Ahle Sunnah like to give him three main claims to fame. Firstly, he was a great companion of the Holy Prophet. Looking at history, he was in the Holy Prophet's midst only for the last 2 years of the Prophet's life. Any hadith claiming words of praise about Muawiya from the Holy Prophet have been fabricated by Muawiya himself. He was a great propaganda machine and spent much of his time in power creating new hadiths about himself and Bani Ummaya. He also created other hadiths trying to discredit Imam Ali (a.s.) and Bani Hashim in an attempt to legitimise his rule.

The reality is that he was not a great companion of the Holy Prophet, and the Prophet enunciated not one word of praise or merit about Muawiya. Many Sunni scholars have come to this conclusion in their research, including Ibn Hajar al-AsqalaniJalaluddin Al-Suyuti and Abdul-Haqq Dehlavi who all attest to there being no hadiths in praise of Muawiya in their books.

The Ahle-Sunnah also believe Muawiya to have been a legitimate ruler, caliph of the Muslims. He obtained the Caliphate by ousting the 2nd Holy Imam, Imam Hasan (a.s.) through bribery and blackmail of Imam Hasan's supporters. He negotiated a peace treaty with Imam Hasan (a.s.) and then systematically broke every single article of the treaty. He broke the central condition of the treaty - regarding succession to his rule, by appointing his cursed son Yazid as Caliph.

He is, in effect, Islam's first tyrant. He was the man who created structures of kinship and autocracy. He dug the roots of tyranny, terror and totalitarianism that defaces Islam today. Famous Sunni scholar, Abul Ala Maududi, in his 1973 book "Caliphate and Kingship", outlines in detail the numerous ways in which Muawiya enriched himself at the expense of the people, how corrupt he was, how many companions and innocent Muslims he killed and how he amassed both power and wealth. He turned the Caliphate into a Kingship. (After all that criticism, Maududi still managed to end the book with "Hazrat Muawiya, (r.a.)"!!)

If he is a true Caliph and deserved the title, why is he not one of the Khulafa-e-Rashideen - the four rightly guided Caliphs? Why does it end with Imam Ali (a.s.), why wasn't Muawiya added to this list? They know the truth, but cannot bring themselves to admit as much. The irony is that how could he be a great Caliph when some of his own companions refused to pray behind him? A companion of Abu Huraira, no friend of the Shia, claims in Sirat-e-Halabiya that "On the plains of Siffin, Abu Huraira would pray Salat behind Ali, but would go and eat with Muawiya. Someone asked why he did this, to which he replied "Food with Muawiya is better, but Salat under Ali is better.""

In fact, Muawiya himself made it obvious that he was only interested in power and material gain. He didn't even pretend to have any inclination towards the spiritual, the moral and the Islamic aspects of caliphate and leadership of the Muslim community. Sunni scholar Sibt ibn al-Jawzi writes in his book, Mir’at al-Zaman that Muawiya openly claims "I did not fight you to pray, fast and pay charity, but rather to be your leader and to control you!" From the horses mouth himself.

His last claim to 'fame', say the Ahle-Sunnah, was that he was a writer of the Holy Quran when it was first revealed - 'Writer of the Revelation." Before analysing this claim further, in and of itself it's not that big a deal to be the Writer - one of the writers became an apostate in later life, as claimed by Sunni scholer Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani who writes in his book "Fath al-Bari""The first man from the Quraysh who was the writer of the revelation was Abdullah bin Saad. After this he apostatised and became a kaffir."

Was Muawiya a Writer of the Revelation? As I mentioned earlier, he converted to Islam in 630 AD, just 2 years before the death of the Holy Prophet. How could he be the writer, when most of the Quran had already been revealed and transcribed by the companions of the Prophet? Sunni scholar Allama Zahabi in his book "Tareekh ul Islam" states that "Muawiya was the writer of the Prophet's correspondence, his letters between the Prophet and the Arabs." I guess "Writer of Letters" doesn't quite have the same ring to it. This is further backed up by notorious Egyptian Sunni scholar Sayyid Qutb, the forefather of Al-Qaeda, who writes in his book "Social Justice in Islam" "The erroneous fable still persists that Mu'awiya was a scribe who wrote down the revelations of Allah's Messenger. The truth is that when Abu Sufyan embraced Islam, he besought the Prophet to give Mu'awiya some measure of position in the eyes of the Arabs; thus he would be compensated of being slow to embrace Islam and of being one of those who had no precedence in the new religion. So the Prophet used Mu'awiya for writing letters and contracts and agreements. But none of the companions ever said that he wrote down any of the Prophet's revelations, as was asserted by Mu'awiyas partisans after he had assumed the throne. But this is what happens in all such cases."

So Muawiya was not the man who wrote down the Quran. He was however the man who made his army place 500 copies of the Quran on spears and lances during the Battle of Siffin when he was losing and yet he is still praised by Sunnis today. When Newsweek claimed in 2005 that soldiers had desecrated copies of the Quran in Guantanamo Bay these same Sunnis were up in arms across the globe and yet they ignore the mistreatment of the Quran by Muawiya centuries ago. He's not the writer of the Quran, he is an abuser of the Quran.

Setting the path for many Muslim leaders today, he was the first ruler to publicly drink alcohol. Sunni scholar Ahmad ibn Hanbal writes in his famous collection of Hadtih: "Musnad" ""Abdullah bin Buraida said: 'I entered on Muawiya with my father, then he (Mu'awiya) made us sit on a mattress then he brought food to us and we ate, then he brought a drink to us, Muawiya drank it and then he offered that to my father, thus (my father) said: 'I never drank it since the messenger of Allah made it [that drink] Haram'...."

However, his greatest claims to infamy are the harsh treatment and even the killings of several companions of the Holy Prophet & Imam Ali (a.s.) for which he was responsible. Abu Dharr al-Ghifari was a great companion of the Holy Prophet, who stated that "The earth has not borne nor has the sky covered, a man more truthful than Abu Dharr"- as narrated by Sunni scholar Allama Muhammed ibn Saad in his book Tabqat Ibn-e-Saad. He goes on to narrate how Abu Dharr constantly used to criticise the corrupt and lavish rule of the third caliph, Uthman ibn Affan. On Muawiya's say so, Uthman had him flogged and whipped and then exiled outside Madina, to Al-Rabathah, where he died alone a few years later.

Muawiya was responsible for the death of the great companion of the Holy Prophet, Ammar ibn Yasir. There are many Sunni narrations praising the status of Ammar ibn Yasir. According to the Sunni book Sunan ibn Majah (one of the Sunni six major Hadith collections), the Holy Prophet said "Ammar is filled with faith, with imaan, from the crown of his head, to the soles of his feet." He was the son of Yasir and Sumaya, who were amongst the first people that were martyred in the name of Islam.

When it came to his death, it was prophesied by the Holy Prophet and is mentioned in both Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim (the 2 most important Sunni books of hadith). Sahih Bukhari narrates: "Ibn 'Abbas said to me and to his son 'Ali, "Go to Abu Sa'id and listen to what he narrates." So we went and found him in a garden looking after it. He picked up his Rida', wore it and sat down and started narrating till the topic of the construction of the mosque reached. He said, "We were carrying one adobe at a time while 'Ammar was carrying two. The Prophet saw him and started removing the dust from his body and said, "May Allah be Merciful to 'Ammar. He will be inviting them (i.e. his murderers, the rebellious group) to Paradise and they will invite him to Hell-fire." 'Ammar said, "I seek refuge with Allah from affliction." (Volume 1, Book 8, Number 438). And in Sahih Muslim: "This hadith has been transmitted on the authority of Umm Salama that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said to 'Ammar: A group of rebels would kill you." (Book 041, Number 6968).

Who were these rebels that would kill Ammar ibn Yasir? History is clear when it records the death of Ammar in the Battle of Siffin. He fought in the ranks of Imam Ali (a.s.) and was killed by the army of Muawiya. The famous English translator of Sahih Muslim, Abd-al-Hamid Siddiqui goes on to add a footnote to the above hadith about Ammar: "This narration is clearly indicative of the fact that in the conflict between Hadrat Ali and his opponents, Hadrat Ali was on the right as Ammar Ibn Yasir was killed in the Battle of Siffin fighting in the camp of Hadrat Ali." It does not, therefore, make much sense to say that both Imam Ali (a.s.) and Muawiya were in the right.

Muawiya then went on to have Ammar ibn-Yasir beheaded and mutilated. It was Muawiya who first introduced such immoral and un-Islamic practices that his cursed son Yazid would then continue at Karbala and that so many Muslim terrorists continue around the world today - with their beheadings of hostages and mutilations of the bodies of their enemies.

Muawiya was also responsible for the deaths of other Muslims such as Hujr ibn AdiAbul Ala Maududi writes in "Caliphate and Kingship" that Muawiya had Hujr ibn Adi buried alive for refusing to curse Imam Ali (a.s.). He also killed Muhammed ibn Abu Bakr - son of the first caliph and foster son of Imam Ali (a.s.), and then wrapped him in the carcass of a dead donkey and burned it to ashes. It was following this incident as narrated by Allama ibn Athir, in his book Tarikh-e-Kamil, that Ayesha, wife of the Holy Prophet and sister of Muhammed ibn Abu Bakr, began cursing Muawiya after every salat.

His greatest crime was killing the grandson of the Holy Prophet - Imam Hasan (a.s.). Muawiya paid Imam Hasan's wife, Jada 100,000 dirhams and his son, Yazid's hand in marriage if she would kill her husband. She poisoned his water, causing him to suffer for 40 days before dying. This has been reported in many major Sunni hadith books, including works by Abul FidaAbdul Rahmān bin Abd RabbāhIbne Shahnah and Ibne Abdul Birr. Muawiya went on to pay Jida the money, but refused to marry his son to her - if she could kill one husband, what would stop her killing her next husband?

Muawiya is arguably the greatest contributor to the Sunni-Shia split that exists today. His hatred of Imam Ali (a.s.) and the Ahlul Bayt continues to this day from his followers, from those Sunnis who ignorantly respect him. The Sunnis who try to build up Muawiya are living in denial. Muawiya was a corrupt, greedy and un-Islamic leader and should be treated as such. I encourage you to open your eyes and hearts and come to realise who Muawiya really was.

56 comments:

  1. This was an amazing excerpt on Muawiya. JazakAllahu khair. You know, I had a discussion with a sister at the Shi'a masjid. It was my first time praying Jummah at a Shi'a masjid and she found out I was previously Sunni so we started talking. At some point, we got into the discussion of the companions that Sunnis venerate. And she argued that we should add 'hazrat' to the names of companions such as Aisha, Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman. She even went as far as saying 'hazrat Muawiya,' which caused me to wonder where do we draw the line?

    It was an interesting discussion. Although, I made it very clear that I did not agree with her point of view. But perhaps, she feels this way because her family is mixed Sunni and Shi'a. But even many Sunnis don't venerate Muawiya.

    Again, jazakAllaahu khair for this thorough blog post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is your mistake All sunnies including all kind of Mdhab (but this is another thing some shia making takia and tell people that they are sunni and against maviya rz..like when they murdered Guided Caliph Hazrat Usman rz then hide themselves in the shadow of Love of Ali rz from being killed in Qasas)repsct Companions of Prophet SAW including Hazrat Muawiya rz and your sister is right we havnt to speak ill about them if you dont i have many stories that insult about Hazrat Ali rz and his family May Allah be pleased with them ans make lanat on shia..... from these kafir shia lies .they also insult Prophet SAW Ali rz also......... they are jews in the label under ahl bayet your sister trying yo safe herself from Mutta with Ayatullahs .......

      Delete
    2. u r another example for a blindfolded follower of the three idiots....why don't u people study quran...u only learn it by heart....as ur leaders(3 idiots)did... study the authentic hadiths like sahih al bukhari , sahih muslim , kanzul amaal , tarikhe tabari or hadith from allama shibli....cuz apart from nahjul balaghat only the abovesaid books r authenticated by both shia and sunni scholars....

      show me where is it specified that the prophet pbuh gave the leadership to any of those 3 idiots other than maula ali a.s.

      yes he was pressurised by umar to give leadership of the war at khaybar...and the result was revealed only after a few moments....when they left the prophet pbuh in the hands of killers and ran off to save their asses......it was that very moment when the surah of nad-e-ali was sent by allah to the messenger pbuh and he requested allah to send maula ali a.s. alone rather that the whole army of angels, jinn, mallaykah and all the supernatural powers...it was the same event when the messenger himself called ali by the title of maul(master) and on the victory he announced the wirasat of ali a.s. - mankunto maula-fa-haaza-ali-un-maula....ali is the master of every one who take me as their master.....

      so my follower of ummul munafeqeen- can u quote any authentic hadith from an authentic scholar...no- cuz u follow the murderers of ummul momineen---the mother of the believers and the leader of the ladies of heaven FATIMAH saws.....(her house was set on fire by umar and other companions of abu-baqr in order to achieve the consent for khilafat-by hook or by crook)

      Delete
    3. zubair chachar talks non sense , in the live for Umar ibne khattabab who was himself an illegitimate child thrown and left on a rfefuse dump .Three kulfa e salasah were the worst bad character munafiqs who were only interested in power and wealth , abondoned their nabi's body and left for saqifa to enact a drama of electing successor which Allah has done long before in favour of Nabi's nafs and cousin .

      Delete
    4. 3 idiots! That is hilarious! Thanks for that.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for your kind words.

    He definitely does not deserve in any way shape or form to be called 'Hazrat'. Please feel free to pass this blog on to your friend.

    As for the 3 caliphs, there is definitely a debate to be had, but for certain Uthman shouldn't be given that title for starters!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree he should definately not be called Hazrat. Let us remember what Bibi Zaynab (alayhus salam) said of Yazid, these people were not considered in such a light by our Ahul Bayt and that shouldn't be ignored.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Salaam sis,
    Mashallah this is an amazing post and a great blog! I so appreciate your efforts. May Allah SWT grant us all success.

    Yes, the best (and most authentic) words used for Yazid, Muawiya and the like are in the Sermon of Bibi Zaynab (salaamAllah alaiha) the way she has described them with such sharp and eloquent words. Mashallah.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for your kind words. Inshallah I plan to post a blog on another character falsely revered by the Sunnis this week.

    Point of clarification, I'm not female!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very Useful information, Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is pathetic that rejectionists(rafidies) talk about islam and the companions of the last messenger of Allah(PBUH).
    The great imam of Ahlus-sunnah Imam shafi'e said that I have not seen anybody who speaks more lies than a Rafidhi.....
    We also know that your origin is from a person named Abdullah ibne saba (a jew)........

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. the imam syafie also said that if loving a ahlul bayt is considered a rafidi, then i am a rafidi... :)

      Delete
  8. Hazrat muwaiyah (r.a) was a companion of prophet and a great leader.All fake stories about him are made by shias who are agents of jews and descendants of abdullah ibn sabah

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NO,Mu'awyia is a kafir, al hassan's wife said so. SUNNIES ARE jewish. Or would u perfer wahabi. You people hate islam and shias, while shias are against israel. LOOK AT THE KING OF SAUDI ARABIA! HE IS A JEW JUST LIKE MU AWYIA! he was a hater of ahlel bayt, i am a sunni but i wanna be a shia cause of u kafirs! i am a descendant of the prophet,your not i know more than u!

      Delete
    2. YAA..BROTHER EVEN I WANT TO BE FOLLOWER OF AHLE BAIT AND FOLLOWWER OF TRUE LEADER HAZRAT ALI(AS)..I USED TO BE AMONG SUNNIS AND NOW IAM A FOLLOWER OF HZT ALI(AS)..I DONT WANT BE AMONG THOSE WHO FIGHT AMONG THEMSELVES(SUNNIS) NOW DECIDING WAT IS RITE AND WAT IS RIGHT TO FOLLOW..ALHAMDULILLAH ALLAH SWT has shown me true path and i pray that ALLAH SWT to help me follow the PATH OF AALE RASOOL SAW..AMEEN

      Delete
    3. YAA.. BROTHER EVEN I WANT BE A FOLLOWER OF AHLE BAIT AND AALE RASOOL (SAW)..I WAS AMONG SUNNIS WHO TODAY ARE CORRECTING THEIR ISLAM ..WAT IS RIGHT AND WHAT IS WRONG AND FIGHTING AMONG THEMSELVES THAT THIS IS CORRECT AND THAT IS CORRECT..I WAS SO CONFUSED..BUT ALLAH SWT HELPED ME TO FOLLOW THE PATH OF AALE RASOOL(SAW)..ACCEPTING HAZRAT ALI(AS) AS THE TRUE LEADER(TAGHUT) SO..INSHA ALLAH... I WILL BE GUIDED..AND PRAY ALLAH(SWT) TO HELP ME AND GUIDE ME ON A STRAIGHT PATH (SIRAT AL MUSTAQIM) TILL I DIE..AMEEN

      Delete
    4. Salam aleykum, ... with all repect, fake stories made ​​by Shiites? have you read your own books? he cursed Imam Ali, and punished those who did not. Not only that, much more ... you should read your books.
      The Prophet said: whoever offends ali, offends me and whoever offends me will be thrown into hell. in your own books, come on, come with better arguments instead of telling that its fake...... bukhari and muslim is 100% sahih, isn it? :)

      Delete
    5. I ask myself this question and the answer becomes very obvious to me: If I were to travel in time to the Ali and Muawia era, as good muslim who would I support? The answer is, without any doubt ALI and the family of the prophet. The crimes that have been committed against Ali (RA) and the Ahl bait are unforgivable. Any sincere believer who looks at the history would feel a deep disgust with what Muawia and sons did to the family of the Prophet. For curious people: no I am not shia but an Ex- sunni. Actually the sunni concept is very much based on lies , intimidation and bully tactics which were used by the crooks in the past to gain power and collect enough gold and silver to be branded with in hell.

      Delete
    6. There are ahadith from Sunni traditions against muawiya, If you want a refernce i can show you.
      We read in Waq’at Sifeen page 217 and Tarikh Tabari Volume 8 page 186 that Abdullah ibne Umar narrates that he heard Rasulullah say:

      “Mu’awiya shall not die on the path of Islam”.

      Both the above books on the same pages also record a similar hadith, this time narrated by Jabir bin Abdullah who testified that he heard Rasulullah (s) say:

      “At the time of his death, Mu’awiya shall not be counted as member of my Muslim Ummah”

      Delete
  9. Allah, make him Muawiya guided, a guider, and guide people through him." [Tirmidhi 3824, 3018]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i am a muslim sunni, and u r a kafir

      Delete
    2. This is a hadeeth maudoo ... Fabricated.

      Delete
  10. Around 140 Al-Hijra, the tomb of the Prophet (S) needed repairs. Builders asked Imam Jafar Sadiq whether it was right to climb the roof. The Imam responded, "Maybe you will find him engaged in sex with one of his wives."
    (Usool-e-Kafi, Imam Kaleeni, Kitabil Hujjat 1:45

    ReplyDelete
  11. you people have to start to discuss what you have done for Allah and not what the others did. bcause talking of someone else will not help you to go in Jannat

    ReplyDelete
  12. excellent post!!! i explained this to my friends in the school but they wont listen,because our islamiat teacher himself adds raziullahtaalah with muawiyas name and even with yazids name!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I dont trust any one how trust any one from abu sofyan famely .I am not sony or anygod athar muslem of any name.exept i warshab la elah ela alah mohammad rusool alah.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It is a really big misconception with you brother. Ahle Sunnat don'nt address jasjid and muawiya as hazrath or raziullatallah, it is the wahabis who do. I am a sunni and i hate yasjid, muawiya and all those who support them.
    Please dont not consider the WAHABIS as sunnis they are far away from iman. A true sunni will always love and respect our prophed(pbuh) and ahle baet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Shiekh Ahmed Masood ..... and you damn sunnni you are kafir rather if you doesnt respect Sahabi Rasool SAW...Mauawiya rz

      Delete
    2. wow is it tought in wahabi that not believe in muawiya is makes u kafeer? lol which in the pillars of iman is dat?

      Delete
    3. ALLAH B WITH U

      Delete
  15. To know about muawiya visit the site fully dedicated to the character of muawiya.
    http://muaviyah.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  16. Muwaiyah meaning is braking bitch he destroy islam and made many factions and make many the fuel of jahnum

    ReplyDelete
  17. y do u guys say bad words nd ruin ur emman nd deeds

    ReplyDelete
  18. JazakAllah Khair.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Salaam to all on here,after reading the above passage and the following comments and replies,i'm truly shocked and embarrassed for all on here,to have seen the prophet(pbuh)in their lifetime with their very own eyes and brought imaan is the one thing which we will never be able to do and the sahaba have,if anyone can claim such a thing then please put forward your argument and you will be considered the longest living sahaba, so if not for any other reason than that,please stop abusing and swearing at the sahaba,the prophet (pbuh)didn't do no such actions,instead he would explain with love and kindness and understanding,who are we to judge the level of imaan of the sahabas or of any muslims for that matter,have we learned nothing from the teachings of our beloved prophet(pbuh. I would ask everyone 'whether sunni or shia' to please put forward your arguments in a constructive and educated manner,without the use of abusive and derogatory language.This is below the character of a true muslim,and before writing anything please think 'WHAT WOULD THE PROPHET(PBUH)THINK OF WHAT I'M GOING TO WRITE.Thank you to all brothers and sisters,may allah keep your imaan strong ameen.

    ReplyDelete
  20. A small correction brother. Karbala was not a battle; one does not go to battle with all the family members including a six month old baby. It was simply a slaughter of innocents by some extremely bad people led by a non-believer!

    ReplyDelete
  21. curse of Allah be upon yazid and shimmar both were couple of cowardic basterds!!!

    ReplyDelete
  22. why do sunni's always support villianish characters of islam?Laanat on Muawiya.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Muaviya has no right to fight with Ali (RA) who was the a cousin of our Holy Prophet, first young muslim, son in law of our Holy Prophet and above all he was the AHLUL BAITH. He was ready to scarify his life on the day of Hijra on behalf of the prophet for which he was chosen both by Allah and his Prophet. He is the father of the grand children of our holy prophet.

    On the other hand this Muaviya was a selfish, power hungry and instrumental in killing number of Sahabis and muslim brothers. He appointed his son YAZEED Launathullah as his successor and introduced the dynasty rule to the muslim world for which Hazrath Aboobaker, Umar and Uzman were against.

    I am a Sunni muslim and an AHLUL BAITH. I will never forgive this Muaviya, His son Lunathulla and who ever supported him. They are all involved in destruction of my great, great, grand fathers.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Thanks for sharing your nice thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  25. It is a shame that as muslims we refuse to listen to logic, from abu sufyan to yazeed it is clearly documented that they were avid enemies of the ahlulbayt, now if we dont want to accept then so be it, but on the day of judgement surely we wont be able to sit on the fence and surely it will be to late to make ammends jazakallah

    ReplyDelete
  26. See this is how a true human speaks the truth , He has put the deviated sect to shame . In fact moaviah maloun is the true founder of this sect which is called ahle sunnah wal jama'a . They have created such a divide that the two factions can never come together and the majority will continue to be the terrorists and the followers of Ahlebayt e Rasool will alway be victims .

    ReplyDelete
  27. yes, it is the shias who are siding with Israel and America. Saudis, Qataris, Jordanian are all shias. Iran is the only sunni nation

    ReplyDelete
  28. Salam Everyone, We should follow our Prophet(saw) as he did in the day of Mubahila, when he took his family against the Najrans, and said to curse the liars.
    Let us all pray to Allah (SWT) that whoever think Yazeed and Moavia to be good, let their hisab kitab be with them on the day of Judgement. And let them go where these two great people go. (All of you say, Ameen)

    ReplyDelete
  29. I am not a shia, but I have issues accepting Muawiyah as righteous. I will not curse him, only because he is classed as a companion. I will, however condemn his actions and openly say he had an agenda. I will also say tha Ali R.A was the man of Haqq.
    I do refute the slandering of Abu Bakr R.A, Umar R.A and Uthmaan R.A as these three sacrificed their lives for the sake of Islam. The Prophet Muhammed S.A.W gave them glad tidings in their lifetime of achievements that elevated their status. I would humbly request people did not swear about these companions. They have done more to benefit Islam than what we could ever do. P.S I am a Razavi or Radawi from Imaam Raza, Ahle Bait and I am speaking from the heart.

    ReplyDelete
  30. lol right on the ball. Wake up to the truth around, my muslim brothers.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Prophet of Allah regarding the cursed Abu Sufyan and his accursed tree said: لعين بن لعين بن لعين which means The cursed son of cursed son of cursed!!!!!!! Does any candidate meets this fine description but Cursed abu sufyan, Cursed moawyah and Cursed yazid????????

    ReplyDelete
  32. Ummah you listening???????
    Ibn Majah relates that Abd Allah ibn 'Umar said: "The Prophet (saws) came to us and said, 'O Muhajirun, you may be afflicted by five things; God forbid that you should live to see them. If fornication should become widespread, you should realise that this has never happened without new diseases befalling the people which their forebears never suffered. If people should begin to cheat in weighing out goods, you should realise that this has never happened without drought and famine befalling the people, and their rulers oppressing them. If people should withhold Zakat, you should realise that this has never happened without the rain being stopped from falling; and were it not for the animals' sake, it would never rain again. If people should break their covenant with Allah and His Messenger, you should realise that his has never happened without Allah sending an enemy against them to take some of their possessions by force. If the leaders do not govern according to the Book of Allah, you should realise that this has never happened without Allah making them into groups and making them fight one another."

    ReplyDelete
  33. According to Ahmad, Abd Allah ibn Amr said: "I heard the Prophet say, If you see my Ummah fearing a tyrant so much that they dare not tell him that he is a tyrant, then there will be no hope for them. The Prophet said, Among my Ummah, some will be swallowed up by the earth, some bombarded with stones, and some transformed into animals." Woe upon the Ummah if they stay silent to the Tyrants!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  34. It is the hadees of Prophet (sas) that those who curse my Sahaba are not from us, thus everyone should keep this in mind. We are not capable of judging the Sahabas . Allah chose them to be a sahaba and Hazrat Mawaia (r.a) was a Sahaba so we cannot curse a sahaba

    ReplyDelete
  35. PEACE WITH YOU AND GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR FAMILY

    ReplyDelete
  36. Allah knows best so please stop this bickering and let Allah judge his creations as only Allah all knowing....
    Please say dua for everyone as we all make mistakes.

    ReplyDelete
  37. MASHA ALLAH
    THANKS FOR THE EXPLANATION EVEN I VE ALREADY KNOWN AND I'M LIVING MY LIFE AND I FOLLOW THE PATH OF AHLUL BAYT
    ALHAMDULILLAH

    ReplyDelete
  38. Lets rather focus on common challenges facing our ummah and humanity. Lets lose differences in sect caste race gender class nationality culture but rather respect one and all as spiritual beings. Imagine if we could focus all this "negative energy" into challenging the core enemy of Islam and muslims, the rogue state of Israel. Why dont we focus "positive energy" into addressing poverty inequality hunger homelessness as in Islam every human being is entitled to basic right of food shelter health education. Lets debate rather mechanisms to address these current challenges rather than the past which we cannot impact on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment is supposed to be addressed to the Wahabeasts ... Why because they are those who see other sects as pagans and even incite their followers to kill them. For Islam to be peaceful let us respect each other and try to encourage peaceful dialogue base on pure academics as done by this brother. Let follow the truth and stop wasting our time on lies.

      Delete